ARJES Impaktor vs Competitors

Terex mid-class twin-shaft shredder positioned for C&D and biomass processing, comparable to the ARJES Impaktor 850 in operating weight class.

Lindner mid-class single-shaft shredder aimed at waste wood and refuse-derived fuels, often positioned against the ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II in the 20-tonne class.

Doppstadt slow-speed twin-shaft shredder positioned for green waste, root wood, and biomass — the closest direct competitor to the ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II in the German market.

Hammel VB 950 DK — a stationary twin-shaft primary shredder powered by a CAT C13 diesel-electric plant, often positioned against the ARJES Impaktor 1000 for scrap metal and ELV processing at 400 kW class.

Atlas Copco ST 1000 — a mobile diesel-hydraulic twin-shaft shredder positioned for construction and demolition recycling, often compared against the ARJES Impaktor 1100 in the 575–600 kW heavy-class segment.

Metso LT120 — a mobile jaw crusher positioned for primary reduction of concrete, asphalt, and demolition aggregate, often shortlisted alongside the ARJES Impaktor 1250 D for high-volume C&D recycling yards.

Lindner Komet 2800 — a stationary twin-shaft electric shredder positioned for waste wood, RDF, and biomass processing, often compared against the ARJES Impaktor 1250 E in the 500 kW heavy-electric class.

EDGE heavy-class twin-shaft shredder (29.2 t, CAT C9.3 310 kW) positioned for high-volume C&D and scrap, weighed against the ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II (14.0 t, Volvo Penta 129 kW) on CEE logistics, cassette service, and thermal stability.

Metso heavy-class twin-shaft shredder (35.0 t tracked, CAT C15 403 kW) positioned for high-volume primary reduction, compared with the ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II (14.0 t, Volvo Penta 129 kW) on 10k-hour TCO, transport permitting, and rebar wrapping prevention.

TANA Shark 4400 — a single-shaft slow-speed shredder (32 t, Cummins 400 kW) with adjustable counter-screen for RDF-fuel fraction control, weighed against the ARJES Impaktor 1250 E electric flagship (500 kW VFD dual asynchronous motors) on 10,000-hour energy TCO and rebar wrapping failure modes. The same critique extends to the Komptech Terminator 6000 single-shaft architecture (28 t, CAT 440 kW).

Comparación estratégica: shredder móvil ARJES IMPAKTOR en obra vs planta de reciclaje RCD fija. Distancia de equilibrio 10,14 km, CAPEX 355 k€–620 k€ vs 1,0 M€–1,8 M€+.

ARJES IMPAKTOR interno vs subcontratación: el subcontratista integra un 30–40 % de margen de beneficio por tonelada. El procesamiento interno ahorra 6–12 €/tonelada, se amortiza en 1,5–2,5 años y construye patrimonio en el balance.

Diesel hydrostatic vs electric VFD shredder: €1.50/L diesel vs €0.15/kWh electricity. Energy TCO over 10,000 hours, infrastructure prerequisites, emission compliance, and site mobility trade-offs analyzed.