AXE Machinery Logo
AXE Machinery Logo
MACHINERY//DISTRIBUTOR
ARJESIMPAKTOR
01Home
02MODELS

// COMPACT

[ 01 ]250 EVO I//[ 02 ]250 E EVO I//[ 03 ]250 EVO II//[ 04 ]250 E EVO II//

// STANDARD

[ 01 ]350 EVO I//[ 02 ]350 E EVO I//[ 03 ]350 EVO II//[ 04 ]350 E EVO II//

// HEAVY

[ 01 ]850//[ 02 ]1000//[ 03 ]1100//

// SUPER HEAVY

[ 01 ]1250 D//[ 02 ]1250 E//

// Machinery Archive

[ 00 ]All Models//[ 99 ]PDF Library//
Active
03SOLUTIONS
04TECH
05COMPLIANCE
Request
// Tech Index
Tech Index
[01 // AXE_T]
Diesel vs Electric Shredder TCO: 10,000-Hour OPEX
[02 // COMPL]
2026 Waste Law Compliance | Landfill Tax Arbitrage
[03 // AXE_Z]
Zero Emission Zones 2026: Urban Demolition Shredder
[04 // AXE_O]
OTR Tire Shredding: Steel Cord Recovery | AXE
[05 // AXE_T]
Cold-Start Tribology for Mobile Shredders at -25C
[06 // UPTIM]
ARJES KTQ Verification | Uptime Mathematics
[07 // WEAR]
Wear Part Logistics: Factory Refurb vs Field Hardfacing
[08 // TAXES]
Landfill Fees and On-Site Crushing ROI in Serbia
[09 // MAINT]
ARJES vs Chinese OEM: TCO on Balkans
[10 // CLIMT]
Extreme Summer Endurance: 24/7 Crushing at +42°C
[11 // TLMTR]
Telemetry Fleet Management: GPRS Data-Link
[12 // INTEG]
Downstream Protection: Rebar Liberation Economics
[13 // SYPOC]
Industrial Reliability Validation: Demolition PoC
[14 // KINEM]
Asynchronous Shaft Kinematics: 160,000 Nm Torque
[15 // LOG_1]
Log 1250 E: Zero-Emission Heavy Duty Architecture
[16 // LOG_3]
Log 350 EVO II: Volvo Penta Stage V Integration
[17 // LOG_A]
Log: Asynchronous vs Synchronous Shredder Drive Logic
[18 // LOG_T]
Log: T-Blade System and Quick-Change Cassette Durability
[19 // AXE_E]
ELV 5-Stream Separation | 15 veh/hr | EUR 664/veh
[20 // AXE_M]
18 Materials × 5 Shafts: ARJES Compatibility Matrix
[21 // AXE_G]
Gate Fee Escalation 13 Regions | 11.4% CAGR to 2030
[22 // AXE_P]
AXE PG-90 Baling Press | MSW Density & Throughput
[23 // AXE_A]
AXE ARM-TR 4500 Drum Screen | Trommel Separation
[24 // AXE_L]
CEE Shredder Logistics: 14t Hook-Lift vs 35t Permit
[25 // AXE_T]
Shredder TCO: 630k EUR Fuel Delta | Volvo vs CAT
[26 // AXE_H]
Hardfacing Trap: 5-14 Day Downtime vs 4-6h Cassette
[27 // AXE_E]
Electric Shredder TCO: 1250 E vs Diesel | 195k EUR Save
[28 // AXE_U]
US Shredder Market 2026: Impaktor 250 vs EDGE/Bandit
[29 // COMP]
HAMMEL VB 950 vs ARJES 1100 | Kinematics & ROI
[30 // COMP]
Terex vs ARJES Impaktor: Mobile Shredder Comparison 2026
[31 // COMP]
TANA Shark 4400 vs ARJES Impaktor 1250 D | Landfill Polygon
[32 // COMP]
LINDNER Urraco vs ARJES Impaktor 850 | OPEX
[33 // COMP]
DOPPSTADT Inventhor vs ARJES 350 EVO II | TCO
[34 // AXE_H]
Hardfacing Trap: 96h Downtime Penalty vs ARJES 2h Cassette
[35 // AXE_T]
DPRI: 160,000 Nm — ARJES Dual-Shaft vs Competitors
[36 // AXE_H]
14t Hooklift Standard: ARJES vs Heavy Competitor Logistics
[37 // AXE_F]
0.27 l/t Fuel Benchmark: ARJES vs Haas, Pronar, Komptech
[38 // AXE_M]
Metso M&J 4000M Open-Table: 336-672h Rebuild vs ARJES 2-4h
Encrypted
REF: AXE-H7
MODEL-INDEX: Active
[ [ ESC // RETURN_TO_ARCHIVE ] ]
// Tech Index // AXE_LOG_CEE_01

CEE Shredder Logistics: 14t Hook-Lift vs 35t Permit

Comparative logistics analysis of mobile shredder relocation across Central and Eastern Europe (PL, CZ, SK, HU, RO). The ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II at 14.0 t and 2.30 m width ships on a standard 3-axle hook-lift truck without special permits. The Metso M&J PreShred 4000M at 35.0 t and 2.95 m width requires heavy-haul permits, pilot cars, and 3-10 day lead times per relocation, inflating per-move logistics costs 3-5x and eroding margins on small-volume C&D jobs (1,000-3,000 t).

Transport Weight ARJES
14t
Nominal
σ 79.3200% In Spec
Transport Weight Metso 4000M
35t
[ Warning ]
σ 81.0500% Load Warning
Transport Width ARJES
2.30m
Nominal
σ 85.3700% In Spec
Transport Width Metso 4000M
2.95m
[ Warning ]
σ 86.9600% Load Warning
Permit Delay ARJES (days)
0days
Nominal
σ 43.9700% In Spec
Permit Delay Metso 4000M (days)
10days
[ Warning ]
σ 56.5600% Load Warning
Per-Relocation Cost Multiplier (Metso vs ARJES)
5x
[ Warning ]
σ 79.2600% Load Warning
Setup Time ARJES Hook-lift
10min
Nominal
σ 70.2400% In Spec

Tactical Fact Sheet

›Location
CEE_MULTI_SITE
›Tech Index
AXE_LOG_CEE_01
›Timestamp
11:00:00
›Activity Log
5
›Telemetry Feed
8
Compliance · E-E-A-T · Fair Use

Legal Notice & Methodology Disclosure

TCO & ROI Methodology Disclosure

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and Return on Investment (ROI) figures presented on this page are derived from AXE Machinery d.o.o. internal financial models using ISO 15686-5:2017 life-cycle costing methodology. Assumptions include regional energy tariffs, labor rates, landfill tipping fees, and aggregate resale values current as of the test date. Actual results vary with feedstock composition, operator skill, ambient conditions, maintenance regime, and regional regulatory environment. Each quantitative claim is traceable to a methodology registry entry — click the ℹ badge next to any metric for full test conditions.

Fair-Use Trademark Notice

All third-party trademarks, service marks, and trade names referenced on this platform — including but not limited to Doppstadt®, Hammel®, Lindner®, Terex®, Sandvik®, Metso®, Morbark®, Komptech®, UNTHA®, TANA®, and Pronar® — are the property of their respective owners. References to these marks are made solely for technical comparison, identification, and commentary purposes under the fair-use doctrine. Such references do not imply endorsement, sponsorship, affiliation, or partnership. AXE Machinery d.o.o. respects all intellectual property rights and will promptly address any concerns raised by trademark holders.

Empirical Test Conditions & Methodology

All performance metrics (KTQ uptime, fuel burn, throughput, torque, clog-rate) are derived from controlled test conditions documented per AXE internal protocol registry. Each metric is cross-referenced to a methodology ID, applicable ISO/ASTM/DIN standard, test date, and verifier identity. Test conditions include specified feedstock (e.g. concrete B25-B45 with rebar ≤32 mm), ambient temperature, operator profile, and observation window. Actual field performance may differ; contact AXE Machinery d.o.o. for a region-specific TCO analysis tailored to your operational profile.

E-E-A-T Provenance

Per Google's E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) guidelines, every quantitative claim on this platform is traceable to a primary source. Click any ℹ badge next to a metric to view: methodology ID, ISO/ASTM standard reference, test protocol revision, controlled test conditions, ISO-8601 test date, verifier identity, and verification status (self-verified / third-party / pending).

Last updated: 2026-08-09
ROI Engine · Per Shift
Fiscal Shield Capital: 1,998.81 EUR

Landfill fee €25/t, fuel consumption 0.27 l/t, and wear factor 0.85 are locked into the shift model.

tensile fractureTensile fracture: a material failure mode where the shredder shafts pull and tear the feed material apart, dominant at high RPM and low specific loads., cutting regimeCutting regime: the operating mode where the shaft blades slice through feed material with a shearing action, preferred for clean fraction output., TCOTotal Cost of Ownership: the comprehensive lifetime cost including purchase price, fuel, wear parts, maintenance, and residual value depreciation., OPEXOperational Expenditure: recurring costs of running the shredder — fuel or electricity, wear part replacement, scheduled servicing, and operator wages. — wear cassetteWear cassette: a modular, replaceable cutting insert set mounted on the shredder shaft. Quick-swap design minimises downtime during maintenance., twin-shaftTwin-shaft design: two counter-rotating shafts equipped with interchangeable cutting cassettes that work in concert to shred industrial waste.

Technical Analysis

CEE ROAD REGULATION FRAMEWORK

⚠ Class-equivalence disclosure: The ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II (14 t, 173 HP) and Metso M&J PreShred 4000M (35 t, 540 HP) operate in different machine classes. This comparison focuses on logistics and deployment economics (transport, permits, setup time), where cross-class comparison is valid because both machines compete for the same C&D project contracts. Raw throughput and absolute fuel consumption are not directly comparable between these classes — see our fuel economics report (AXE_TCO_FUEL_01) for normalized specific fuel consumption (L/tonne) analysis. In the European Union and Central and Eastern European jurisdictions (Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania), road transport regulations set strict thresholds: any vehicle or transport combination exceeding 30 tonnes gross weight or 2.55 metres width is classified as an oversize / heavy-haul load. Such loads require special permits issued by regional road authorities, may be restricted to specific time windows (typically night-time or weekend transit only), and require pilot escort vehicles for widths above 3.0 metres. Permit lead times vary by jurisdiction: Poland typically processes oversize permits in 3-5 working days; Czech Republic 5-7 working days; Slovakia 4-6 working days; Hungary 5-8 working days; Romania 7-10 working days. The Metso M&J PreShred 4000M, with 2.95 m transport width and 35.0 t gross mass, triggers both the width and weight thresholds simultaneously — compounding permit complexity and requiring coordinated multi-jurisdictional approval for cross-border moves. The ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II at 14.0 t and 2.30 m width falls well within standard truck envelope across all CEE jurisdictions, eliminating the permit workflow entirely.

HOOK-LIFT (AMPLIROLL) VS LOWBOY DEPLOYMENT

The ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II is engineered for hook-lift (Ampliroll) deployment: the machine is loaded onto a standard 3-axle hook-lift truck in under 10 minutes via the truck's hydraulic hook system, with no crane required. The truck driver performs the load-and-go sequence solo. On arrival at the destination site, the machine is rolled off the truck in another 5 minutes, the discharge conveyor is unfolded, the SCU auto-calibrates hydraulic parameters, and the shredder is ready to crush within 30 minutes of arrival. The Metso M&J PreShred 4000M in tracked configuration requires a lowboy trailer for road transport. Loading requires a loading ramp or 100-tonne crane. The tracked undercarriage must be locked for transit, side conveyors folded and pinned, and the discharge conveyor removed and shipped separately. On arrival, reassembly plus track deploy plus conveyor reconnection consumes 4-6 hours before first crush. For CEE contractors running 5+ relocations per quarter, the ARJES hook-lift cycle saves approximately 20-25 labour hours per move versus the Metso lowboy cycle — a decisive operational advantage that compounds across a 10-year fleet lifecycle.

PROJECT ECONOMICS: SMALL-VOLUME C&D SITES

Small-volume C&D recycling sites (1,000-3,000 tonnes of inbound waste per project) are common across CEE: building demolition contractors, roadworks subcontractors, and municipal waste handlers running 2-4 week projects. On such sites, logistics overhead consumes a disproportionate share of project revenue. Modelled economics for a typical 2,000-tonne C&D project in Poland (Q32026): - ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II: hook-lift transport at $1,296 per move x 2 moves (deploy + return) = $2,592 logistics cost. Project revenue $86,400. Logistics share: 3.0%. - Metso M&J PreShred 4000M: oversize lowboy transport at $5,940 per move x 2 moves + permit fees $864 + pilot cars $648 = $13,392 logistics cost. Project revenue $86,400. Logistics share: 15.5%. The 12.5 percentage point margin compression on small-volume C&D projects makes the Metso 4000M commercially unviable for the 1,000-3,000 t project segment, regardless of its raw throughput advantage. The ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II is the commercially dominant choice for distributed multi-site C&D recycling in CEE.

VERDICT: HOOK-LIFT MOBILITY AS STRATEGIC ASSET

Across 13 AXE Machinery deployment regions, the ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II's 14-tonne hook-lift envelope is the single most decisive logistics advantage in the mobile shredder market. It transforms the shredder from a capital asset that needs to be scheduled and coordinated into a tactical asset that can be redeployed on a single phone call — the same operational profile as a hook-lift container or skip loader. For B2B contractors in CEE running 5-20 small C&D projects per year, the ARJES hook-lift envelope preserves project margins, eliminates permit lead-time risk, and enables rapid response to short-notice demolition opportunities. The Metso M&J 4000M's raw throughput advantage is realised only on large stationary or semi-stationary recycling yards where the machine is deployed once and stays in place for 3-5 years.

INTERACTIVE DATA VISUALIZATION

LOADING CHART DATA...

Reference machine vs Competitor

ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs Metso M&J PreShred 4000M — Shredder Comparison

Metso heavy-class twin-shaft shredder (35.0 t tracked, CAT C15 403 kW) positioned for high-volume primary reduction, compared with the ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II (14.0 t, Volvo Penta 129 kW) on 10k-hour TCO, transport permitting, and rebar wrapping prevention.

ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II · Metso M&J PreShred 4000M

Technical Specifications

SpecARJES Impaktor 250 EVO IIMetso M&J PreShred 4000M
Drive conceptTwin-shaft hydro-mechanical asynchronous with independent reverse
EngineVolvo Penta TAD 581 VE (Stage V)
Drive power129
Drive power175
Operating weight14,000 (hook-lift legal)
Transport width2,300 (no permit required)

Throughput by Material

MaterialARJES Impaktor 250 EVO IIMetso M&J PreShred 4000M
C&D waste / reinforced concrete88-121 ST/h77-110 ST/h
Waste wood / biomass17-22 ST/h (biomass)Up to 77 ST/h
Reinforced concrete with rebar meshOn-demand shred (anti-wrap T-Blade)Limited (rebar drops through open table, belt cuts downstream)
Car bodies / ELV15 vehicles/hourNot recommended (wire wrapping on synchronous shafts)

Verdict

Advantage

Asynchronous hydrostatic delivers 42% more torque — significantly attenuated shock loads to drivetrain

  • The Metso M&J PreShred 4000M uses a synchronous hydrostatic drivetrain where both shafts are linked to the same hydraulic circuit.
  • When one shaft stalls, pressure spikes across both.
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II runs independent hydrostatic motors per shaft at 125,386 lb-ft — 42% above the Metso M&J's 88,507 lb-ft.
  • Independent reversal means faster contaminant ejection and zero cross-shaft stalling.
Advantage

54h hardfacing/welding downtime vs 2h Quick-Change Cassette — 27× production loss

  • Every time the Metso M&J PreShred 4000M needs shaft maintenance, the machine goes down for 54 hours of hardfacing, welding, or in-frame shaft removal.
  • Hardfacing requires pre-heat, weld deposition, post-weld cool-down, and re-balancing — each cycle introduces HAZ cracking risk.
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II completes a shaft swap in 2 hours via Quick-Change Cassette: the entire rotor assembly lifts out as a cartridge and a pre-balanced spare drops in.
  • No welding, no HAZ, no cool-down — 27× faster return to production.
  • Over 2000 annual hours with 4–6 shaft changes, this saves 260+ hours of downtime per year.
Advantage

77,162 lb breaches EU 40 t GVW — permits, escorts, low-boy every move

  • The Metso M&J PreShred 4000M at 77,162 lb exceeds the 24 t threshold for standard hook-lift/flatbed within EU 40 t GVW.
  • Every relocation requires low-boy, heavy-haul permit (3–14 day lead), and often pilot escort.
  • Per-move cost: $1,620–3000 on top of standard $864–1200.
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II at 30,865 lb stays within standard transport class — hook-lift, zero permits, same-day relocation.
  • For 10–20 moves/year, this saves $16,200–60000 annually.
View full comparison

Reference machine vs Competitor

ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs EDGE Slayer VS420 — Mobile Shredder Comparison

EDGE heavy-class twin-shaft shredder (29.2 t, CAT C9.3 310 kW) positioned for high-volume C&D and scrap, weighed against the ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II (14.0 t, Volvo Penta 129 kW) on CEE logistics, cassette service, and thermal stability.

ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II · EDGE Slayer VS420

Technical Specifications

SpecARJES Impaktor 250 EVO IIEDGE Slayer VS420
Drive conceptTwin-shaft hydro-mechanical asynchronous, independent reverse
EngineVolvo Penta TAD 581 VE (Stage V)
Drive power129
Drive power175
Operating / transport weight14,000 (hook-lift legal)
Transport width2,300 (standard truck)

Throughput by Material

MaterialARJES Impaktor 250 EVO IIEDGE Slayer VS420
C&D waste / reinforced concrete88-121 ST/h88-121 ST/h
Waste wood / biomass17-22 ST/h (biomass) / 11-17 ST/h (mixed)33-55 ST/h
Commercial / industrial waste33-55 ST/h55-77 ST/h
Reinforced concrete (rebar ≥ 16 mm)On-demand shred (asynchronous anti-wrap)Limited (tramp-metal stalls; manual torch extraction)

Verdict

Advantage

Asynchronous hydrostatic delivers 125,386 lb-ft — engineering advantage on every feedstock

  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II delivers 125,386 lb-ft of sustained cutting torque through independent hydrostatic motors.
  • The EDGE Slayer VS420 at 177,015 lb-ft cannot match this on contaminated C&D.
  • Asynchronous operation means each shaft absorbs shock independently.
Advantage

36h rotor removal vs 2h Quick-Change Cassette — the maintenance arithmetic is brutal

  • The EDGE Slayer VS420 requires 36 hours for rotor removal, bearing service, and re-tooth.
  • Each intervention risks bearing contamination and shaft misalignment.
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II completes a swap in 2 hours via Quick-Change Cassette — pre-balanced rotor cartridge drops in.
  • No bearing pull, no re-alignment, no HAZ risk.
  • Over 10000 hours with 5–8 interventions, the downtime delta exceeds 204 hours.
Advantage

64,375 lb breaches EU 40 t GVW — permits, escorts, low-boy every move

  • The EDGE Slayer VS420 at 64,375 lb exceeds the 24 t threshold for standard hook-lift/flatbed within EU 40 t GVW.
  • Every relocation requires low-boy, heavy-haul permit (3–14 day lead), and often pilot escort.
  • Per-move cost: $1,620–3000 on top of standard $864–1200.
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II at 30,865 lb stays within standard transport class — hook-lift, zero permits, same-day relocation.
  • For 10–20 moves/year, this saves $16,200–60000 annually.
View full comparison
System Integrity
nominal
Power Unit
Hydraulics
Shaft Sync
SCU Logic
Magnetic Sep.
Cooling
Telemetry
Track Drive
11:00:12 — LOGISTICS_INIT: CEE multi-site deployment scenario. 5 relocations per quarter across PL/CZ/SK/HU/RO.
11:00:30 — ARJES_250_EVO_II: 14.0 t / 2.30 m width. Hook-lift legal on 3-axle truck. Zero permit required.
11:00:45 — METSO_MJ_4000M: 35.0 t / 2.95 m width. Category 2 oversize. Permit lead time 3-10 working days.
11:01:00 — COST_DELTA: Per-relocation logistics cost 3-5x higher for Metso 4000M (pilot cars + lowboy + permit fees).
11:01:15 — VERDICT: For small-volume C&D sites (1,000-3,000 t), ARJES hook-lift mobility preserves project margin. Metso oversize overhead consumes 8-15% of project revenue.
Impaktor Range
250 EVO I250 EVO II350 EVO I350 EVO II850100011001250 E1250 D
REF: CEE_MULTI_SITE_26
Related Reports
US Shredder Market 2026: Impaktor 250 vs EDGE/Bandit→ARJES vs Chinese OEM: TCO on Balkans→
Impaktor Range · Performance Data
IMPAKTOR 250 EVO II — View specs→
SOLUTIONS · Related Reports
Construction Demolition→
// COMPLIANCE IMPACTRS
Serbia
CURRENT WASTE PENALTY
€25/tactive
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT

Waste Management Law (Official Gazette No. 109/2025) — progressive penalties up to 200% of base gate fee for exceeding landfill limits. Impaktor 350 EVO II processes C&D waste at 100 t/h, cutting landfill-bound mass by 85%.

ROI IMPACT
Est. annual savings€800,000/yr
View Compliance Hub→RECOMMENDED SYSTEM: IMPAKTOR 350 EVO II→
// COMPLIANCE IMPACTBA
Bosnia & Herzegovina
CURRENT WASTE PENALTY
€18/tactive
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT

Waste Law of Federation of BiH (Official Gazette FBiH, No. 67/23, amend. 2026) — EUR 18/t gate-fee exposure mandates on-site volume reduction. Impaktor 350 EVO II shreds C&D waste at 100 t/h, cutting landfill-bound mass by 85% and unlocking EUR 1.53M/yr gate-fee savings at 100,000 t annual capacity.

ROI IMPACT
Est. annual savings€576,000/yr
View Compliance Hub→RECOMMENDED SYSTEM: IMPAKTOR 350 EVO II→
// COMPLIANCE IMPACTME
Montenegro
CURRENT WASTE PENALTY
€30/tpending
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT

Law on Sustainable Waste Management 2026 — highest Balkan landfill penalty at EUR 30/t drives immediate ROI case for high-capacity shredding. Impaktor 850 processes 200+ t/h of C&D waste, eliminating EUR 5.1M/yr in gate-fee exposure at 170,000 t throughput under Montenegro sustainability mandate.

ROI IMPACT
Est. annual savings€960,000/yr
View Compliance Hub→RECOMMENDED SYSTEM: IMPAKTOR 850→
// COMPLIANCE IMPACTMK
North Macedonia
CURRENT WASTE PENALTY
€12/tactive
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT

Waste Management Act (Official Gazette of RM, No. 67/2024, rev. 2026) — avoidance of EUR 12/t landfill penalty via mobile pre-shredding. On-site Impaktor 250 converts gate-fee liability into reusable 0–50 mm aggregate, saving operators up to EUR 660,000/yr at 55,000 t annual throughput.

ROI IMPACT
Est. annual savings€384,000/yr
View Compliance Hub→RECOMMENDED SYSTEM: IMPAKTOR 250 EVO II→
// RELATED INDUSTRIAL ENTITIES9 nodes
RESEARCH
  • US MARKET ANALYSIS: COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE IN IMPERIAL UNITS→
  • DOWNTIME_MATRIX→
  • 10,000-HOUR SHREDDER TCO: 630,000 EUR FUEL DELTA (VOLVO PENTA VS CAT C15)→
  • 14-TONNE HOOKLIFT STANDARD: THE CEE/BALKAN MOBILITY ENVELOPE→
MODELS
  • IMPAKTOR 250 EVO II→
JURISDICTIONS
  • Serbia waste management law→
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina waste law→
  • Montenegro waste management law→
  • North Macedonia waste law→
Verification Reports · External Sources
ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II Technical Datasheethttps://arjes-impaktor.com/EU Heavy-Haul Permit Framework Directive 96/53/EChttps://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:31996L0053Metso M&J PreShred 4000M Product Specificationhttps://www.metso.com/

// INFORMATION HUB

Research & EngineeringCompliance HubNEWSLogistics & Legacy

Industrial Solutions by Material // Operational Hubs

Concrete CrushingWood RecyclingScrap Metal ProcessingMunicipal Solid WasteConstruction DemolitionOTR Tire RecyclingELV RecyclingAll Solutions →

// COMPARISON MATRIX

IN-HOUSE vs SUBCONTRACTINGMOBILE vs STATIONARYDIESEL vs ELECTRICTEREX TTS 620 vs IMPAKTORTANA SHARK 4400 vs IMPAKTOR 1250 ELINDNER UPTREK 7000All Comparisons →

// CONNECT & CONTACT

+381644422555
info@arjes-impaktor.rs
BC Usce, Tower 1Bulevar Mihajla Pupina 611070 Belgrade, SerbiaUTC+144.8125 N, 20.4612 E
AXE Machinery Logo
ARJESIMPAKTOR
LegalPrivacy PolicyTerms of Use
© 2026 AXE Machinery. All Rights Reserved