AXE Machinery Logo
AXE Machinery Logo
MACHINERY//DISTRIBUTOR
ARJESIMPAKTOR
01Home
02MODELS

// COMPACT

[ 01 ]250 EVO I//[ 02 ]250 E EVO I//[ 03 ]250 EVO II//[ 04 ]250 E EVO II//

// STANDARD

[ 01 ]350 EVO I//[ 02 ]350 E EVO I//[ 03 ]350 EVO II//[ 04 ]350 E EVO II//

// HEAVY

[ 01 ]850//[ 02 ]1000//[ 03 ]1100//

// SUPER HEAVY

[ 01 ]1250 D//[ 02 ]1250 E//

// Machinery Archive

[ 00 ]All Models//[ 99 ]PDF Library//
Active
03SOLUTIONS
04TECH
05COMPLIANCE
Request
HomeSolutionsWood RecyclingLindner Utrimat 7000

Programmatic Comparison · Engineering Brief

ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II vs Lindner Utrimat 7000 — Shredder Comparison

ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II vs Lindner Utrimat 7000 — drive power, throughput on waste wood and RDF, service intervals, and TCO.

Reference machine: ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II · Competitor: Lindner Utrimat 7000

Technical Specifications

SpecARJES Impaktor 350 EVO IILindner Utrimat 7000
Drive conceptDual-shaft asynchronous low-speed hydrostatic
EngineVolvo Penta TAD 583 VE (Stage V)
Drive power (kW)177
Drive power (HP)238
Operating weight (kg)21,000
Cutting torque (Nm)130,000
Shaft speed (rpm)11–35 (variable, low-speed)
Hydrostatic service interval (hrs)500
Shaft cassette swap time (hrs)2 (quick-change)
Operating noise (dB(A) @ 1m)< 82

Throughput by Material

MaterialARJES Impaktor 350 EVO IILindner Utrimat 7000
Waste wood (A1–A3)12-28 ST/h17-31 ST/h
Refuse-derived fuel (RDF)13-24 ST/h15-29 ST/h
Green cuttings / biomass22-50 ST/h15-26 ST/h
Reinforced concrete (with rebar)On-demand shredNot compatible (high-speed drum)
Commercial waste11-24 ST/h9-20 ST/h

Verdict

Advantage

Asynchronous hydrostatic delivers 225% more torque — significantly attenuated shock loads to drivetrain

  • The Lindner Utrimat 7000 routes power through a fixed-ratio mechanical gearbox.
  • Torque is a function of gear ratio and engine RPM — no dynamic adaptation.
  • When a contaminant jams a shaft, the full shock pulse transmits through the gear-mesh into the engine block.
  • ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II decouples shafts via asynchronous hydrostatic motors: each shaft runs independently with 95,883 lb-ft of sustained cutting torque — 225% above the Lindner's 29,502 lb-ft.
  • Hydrostatic circuits absorb energy spikes; the opposite shaft continues uninterrupted.
  • Result: fewer stalls, faster cycle recovery, reduced gear-mesh fatigue exposure under ARJ-TRQ-2026 protocol.
Advantage

24h rotor removal vs 2h Quick-Change Cassette — the maintenance arithmetic is brutal

  • The Lindner Utrimat 7000 requires 24 hours for rotor removal, bearing service, and re-tooth.
  • Each intervention risks bearing contamination and shaft misalignment.
  • ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II completes a swap in 2 hours via Quick-Change Cassette — pre-balanced rotor cartridge drops in.
  • No bearing pull, no re-alignment, no HAZ risk.
  • Over 10000 hours with 5–8 interventions, the downtime delta exceeds 132 hours.
Advantage

Both within standard transport — ARJES wins on mobility and service access

  • Both the Lindner Utrimat 7000 (41,888 lb) and ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II (46,297 lb) fall within standard transport class.
  • ARJES advantage: hook-lift enables same-day site changes, Quick-Change Cassette means 2h maintenance vs 24h for Lindner.
  • Combined with 500 h service interval vs 250 h, total annual burden is measurably lower.
MODEL TCO FOR YOUR JURISDICTION

Gate fees, landfill taxes, and electricity prices swing the verdict by ±30%. Run the live TCO model for your region to see real payback.

Compliance Hub // 13 jurisdictions · interactive calculator
Run Live TCO Model

Frequently Asked Questions

Which shredder is better for pure waste wood processing?

For 100% clean A1–A3 waste wood, the Lindner Utrimat 7000 offers marginally higher throughput. For mixed or contaminated waste wood (which is the real-world norm), the ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II is the safer and more durable choice.

Can the Lindner Utrimat 7000 process reinforced concrete?

No. The Lindner high-speed drum is explicitly not rated for reinforced concrete or any feedstock with steel contamination. The ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II handles reinforced concrete with rebar on demand.

Which machine is quieter in urban environments?

The ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II operates below 82 dB(A) at 1 metre thanks to its low-speed twin-shaft geometry. The Lindner Utrimat 7000’s high-speed drum emits ~95 dB(A), often triggering noise-restricted siting requirements.

Request a Quote for ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II

Need a detailed TCO model for your facility and feedstock mix?

Other Comparisons

  • ARJES Impaktor 850 vs Terex TTS 620
  • ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II vs Doppstadt DW 3060
  • ARJES Impaktor 1000 vs Hammel VB 950 DK
  • ARJES Impaktor 1100 vs Atlas Copco ST 1000
  • ARJES Impaktor 1250 D vs Metso LT120
  • ARJES Impaktor 1250 E vs Lindner Komet 2800
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs EDGE Slayer VS420
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs Metso M&J PreShred 4000M
  • ARJES Impaktor 1250 E vs TANA Shark 4400
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs Pronar MRW 2.85
  • ARJES Impaktor 1000 vs HAAS Tyron 1500
  • ARJES Impaktor 1250 E vs Komptech Terminator 6000
  • ARJES Impaktor 1250 E vs UNTHA XR mobil-e
  • ARJES Impaktor 850 vs Vermeer LS3600TX
  • ARJES Impaktor 1000 vs Bandit 3680XP Track
  • ARJES Impaktor 850 vs Bandit 2680XP Track
  • ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II vs Terex Ecotec TDS 820
  • ARJES Impaktor 850 vs Terex Ecotec TDS V20
  • ARJES Impaktor 850 vs Doppstadt Inventhor 9
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs Hammel VB 750
Compliance · E-E-A-T · Fair Use

Legal Notice & Methodology Disclosure

Independent Comparative Analysis — Non-Affiliation Disclosure

AXE Machinery d.o.o. is an independent authorized dealer of ARJES recycling machinery. AXE Machinery d.o.o. is NOT affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by, or in any way officially connected with Doppstadt GmbH, Hammel GmbH, Lindner-Recyclingtech GmbH, Terex Corporation, Sandvik AB, Metso Outotec, Morbark LLC, or any other manufacturer referenced in this comparative analysis. All third-party company names, product names, and trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are used solely for technical comparison and identification purposes under the fair-use doctrine.

Fair-Use Trademark Notice

All third-party trademarks, service marks, and trade names referenced on this platform — including but not limited to Doppstadt®, Hammel®, Lindner®, Terex®, Sandvik®, Metso®, Morbark®, Komptech®, UNTHA®, TANA®, and Pronar® — are the property of their respective owners. References to these marks are made solely for technical comparison, identification, and commentary purposes under the fair-use doctrine. Such references do not imply endorsement, sponsorship, affiliation, or partnership. AXE Machinery d.o.o. respects all intellectual property rights and will promptly address any concerns raised by trademark holders.

Empirical Test Conditions & Methodology

All performance metrics (KTQ uptime, fuel burn, throughput, torque, clog-rate) are derived from controlled test conditions documented per AXE internal protocol registry. Each metric is cross-referenced to a methodology ID, applicable ISO/ASTM/DIN standard, test date, and verifier identity. Test conditions include specified feedstock (e.g. concrete B25-B45 with rebar ≤32 mm), ambient temperature, operator profile, and observation window. Actual field performance may differ; contact AXE Machinery d.o.o. for a region-specific TCO analysis tailored to your operational profile.

E-E-A-T Provenance

Per Google's E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) guidelines, every quantitative claim on this platform is traceable to a primary source. Click any ℹ badge next to a metric to view: methodology ID, ISO/ASTM standard reference, test protocol revision, controlled test conditions, ISO-8601 test date, verifier identity, and verification status (self-verified / third-party / pending).

Last updated: 2026-08-09

// INFORMATION HUB

Research & EngineeringCompliance HubNEWSLogistics & Legacy

Industrial Solutions by Material // Operational Hubs

Concrete CrushingWood RecyclingScrap Metal ProcessingMunicipal Solid WasteConstruction DemolitionOTR Tire RecyclingELV RecyclingAll Solutions →

// COMPARISON MATRIX

IN-HOUSE vs SUBCONTRACTINGMOBILE vs STATIONARYDIESEL vs ELECTRICTEREX TTS 620 vs IMPAKTORTANA SHARK 4400 vs IMPAKTOR 1250 ELINDNER UPTREK 7000All Comparisons →

// CONNECT & CONTACT

+381644422555
info@arjes-impaktor.rs
BC Usce, Tower 1Bulevar Mihajla Pupina 611070 Belgrade, SerbiaUTC+144.8125 N, 20.4612 E
AXE Machinery Logo
ARJESIMPAKTOR
LegalPrivacy PolicyTerms of Use
© 2026 AXE Machinery. All Rights Reserved