Programmatic Comparison · Engineering Brief
ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs Metso M&J 4000M — 10k-h TCO, 630k EUR fuel delta, 2.30 m standard transport, and anti-wrapping logic.
| Spec | ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II | Metso M&J PreShred 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Drive concept | Twin-shaft hydro-mechanical asynchronous with independent reverse | |
| Engine | Volvo Penta TAD 581 VE (Stage V) | |
| Drive power (kW) | 129 | |
| Drive power (HP) | 175 | |
| Operating weight (kg) | 14,000 (hook-lift legal) | |
| Transport width (mm) | 2,300 (no permit required) | |
| Fuel consumption (l/h, avg) | 18 | |
| Specific fuel (l/t, C&D) | 0.27 | |
| Fuel cost @ 10,000 h (EUR, 1.50 €/l) | 270,000 | |
| Shaft cassette swap time (hrs) | 2 (quick-change cassette) | |
| Cutting table / cassette mass (kg) | 1,800 – 2,000 (removable cassette) | |
| Rebar wrapping resistance | Asynchronous T-Blade self-cleaning (zero wrap) |
| Material | ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II | Metso M&J PreShred 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| C&D waste / reinforced concrete | 88-121 ST/h | 77-110 ST/h |
| Waste wood / biomass | 17-22 ST/h (biomass) | Up to 77 ST/h |
| Reinforced concrete with rebar mesh | On-demand shred (anti-wrap T-Blade) | Limited (rebar drops through open table, belt cuts downstream) |
| Car bodies / ELV | 15 vehicles/hour | Not recommended (wire wrapping on synchronous shafts) |
Gate fees, landfill taxes, and electricity prices swing the verdict by ±30%. Run the live TCO model for your region to see real payback.
Both are mobile twin-shaft shredders, but in fundamentally different weight and power classes: the Metso M&J 4000M ships at 35.0 t with a 403 kW CAT C15, while the ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II is 14.0 t with a 129 kW Volvo Penta. They are commonly shortlisted together for primary C&D reduction where CEE logistics and 10k-hour fuel economics override raw power considerations.
At 1.50 EUR/litre diesel: ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II consumes 18 l/h average for a 270,000 EUR fuel bill. The Metso M&J 4000M consumes 60 l/h average for a 900,000 EUR fuel bill. The 630,000 EUR delta over 10,000 hours exceeds the purchase price of the ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II itself.
Yes. The open cutting table design — engineered to prevent clogging on bulky feedstock — allows long rebar fragments to drop between knives without a cross-cut. On the synchronous shafts, thin rebar mesh or wire wraps around the shaft body, causing friction overheating of Hardox side plates and downstream conveyor belt cuts. The ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II uses asynchronous T-Blade shafts with independent reverse and continuous self-cleaning, eliminating the wrapping failure mode.
Need a detailed TCO model for your facility and feedstock mix?
AXE Machinery d.o.o. is an independent authorized dealer of ARJES recycling machinery. AXE Machinery d.o.o. is NOT affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by, or in any way officially connected with Doppstadt GmbH, Hammel GmbH, Lindner-Recyclingtech GmbH, Terex Corporation, Sandvik AB, Metso Outotec, Morbark LLC, or any other manufacturer referenced in this comparative analysis. All third-party company names, product names, and trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are used solely for technical comparison and identification purposes under the fair-use doctrine.
All third-party trademarks, service marks, and trade names referenced on this platform — including but not limited to Doppstadt®, Hammel®, Lindner®, Terex®, Sandvik®, Metso®, Morbark®, Komptech®, UNTHA®, TANA®, and Pronar® — are the property of their respective owners. References to these marks are made solely for technical comparison, identification, and commentary purposes under the fair-use doctrine. Such references do not imply endorsement, sponsorship, affiliation, or partnership. AXE Machinery d.o.o. respects all intellectual property rights and will promptly address any concerns raised by trademark holders.
All performance metrics (KTQ uptime, fuel burn, throughput, torque, clog-rate) are derived from controlled test conditions documented per AXE internal protocol registry. Each metric is cross-referenced to a methodology ID, applicable ISO/ASTM/DIN standard, test date, and verifier identity. Test conditions include specified feedstock (e.g. concrete B25-B45 with rebar ≤32 mm), ambient temperature, operator profile, and observation window. Actual field performance may differ; contact AXE Machinery d.o.o. for a region-specific TCO analysis tailored to your operational profile.
Per Google's E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) guidelines, every quantitative claim on this platform is traceable to a primary source. Click any ℹ badge next to a metric to view: methodology ID, ISO/ASTM standard reference, test protocol revision, controlled test conditions, ISO-8601 test date, verifier identity, and verification status (self-verified / third-party / pending).