16:05:00 — LOGISTICS_SCAN: Initiating wear part supply chain audit. Two competing models identified: (A) ARJES Factory Refurbishment with Quick-Change Cassette, (B) Competitor Mobile Field Hardfacing with on-machine welding teams.
16:12:00 — MODEL_A_CASSETTE: ARJES operator maintains one spare cassette per machine class. At shaft wear threshold (every 1000-2000 m/h), two-person crew extracts worn cassette (1h), installs spare (1h), ships worn unit to factory. Factory lead time: 5 working days. Thermal treatment: stress-relief annealing + controlled quenching + tempering. Shaft life: 100% of design specification restored.
16:20:00 — MODEL_B_HARDFACING: Competitor dispatches 3-person specialized welding team to machine site. On-machine hardfacing takes 72-120 hours depending on shaft size. Machine halted for entire duration. Thermal control: none. Manual arc welding in uncontrolled field conditions produces uneven heat distribution, residual stress concentrations, and microcracks in the heat-affected zone.
16:28:00 — THERMAL_INTEGRITY_GAP: Factory refurbishment preserves the original heat treatment specification of the shaft steel. Stress-relief annealing at 580-620 C followed by controlled cooling eliminates welding residual stresses. Field hardfacing cannot achieve this. Post-weld fatigue life reduction: estimated 30-50%. Each successive hardfacing cycle compounds the damage, creating an accelerating degradation curve.
16:35:00 — COST_PER_TON_ANALYSIS: Over 2,000 moto-hours processing C&D waste (approximately 80,000 tons for Impaktor 350 EVO II), ARJES cassette model produces a wear cost of approximately 0.35 EUR/ton (one cassette refurbishment cycle at 28,000 EUR). Field hardfacing model: approximately 0.85 EUR/ton (welding team deployment + consumables + production loss at 96 hours downtime). Delta: 0.50 EUR/ton, or 40,000 EUR savings per 2,000 moto-hour season.
16:42:00 — OPERATIONAL_VERDICT: The ARJES cassette exchange model delivers 48x faster return to service (2h vs 96h), 100% thermal treatment integrity (vs uncontrolled field conditions), and 59% lower wear cost per ton (0.35 vs 0.85 EUR/t). The only requirement: one spare cassette per machine class. This is not a cost; it is working capital that preserves the machine value.