// Tech Index

// Tech Index // AXE_FUEL_01

0.27 l/t Fuel Benchmark: ARJES vs Haas, Pronar, Komptech

The ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II publishes a fuel consumption benchmark of 0.27 litres of diesel per tonne of C&D material processed — the lowest published diesel fuel figure in the 2026 mobile shredder dataset. Single-shaft and kinetic-drum competitors run 2.9–3.9x this figure: Haas Tyron 1500 = 0.78 l/t, Pronar MRW 2.85 = 0.92 l/t, Komptech Terminator 6000 = 1.05 l/t. At $6.13/gal and 50,000 t/yr throughput, the annual fuel cost delta between ARJES and Komptech reaches $63,180. 10-year cumulative delta: $631,800 — exceeding the ARJES machine's CAPEX.

ARJES Fuel Benchmark

0.065gal/ST

Nominal

Haas Tyron 1500 Fuel

0.187gal/ST

[ Warning ]

Pronar MRW 2.85 Fuel

0.220gal/ST

[ Warning ]

Komptech Terminator 6000 Fuel

0.252gal/ST

[ Warning ]

Annual Fuel Delta

$51,030USD

[ Warning ]

10-Year Cumulative Fuel Delta

$510,300USD

[ Warning ]

Diesel Price Baseline (EUR/l, Q3 2026)

6.13$/gal

Nominal

CO2 Reduction (t/yr, ARJES vs Komptech)

143ST/hr

Nominal

Tactical Fact Sheet

Location

Main Hub

Tech Index

AXE_FUEL_01

Timestamp

12:30:00

Activity Log

Telemetry Feed

Compliance · E-E-A-T · Fair Use

Legal Notice & Methodology Disclosure

TCO & ROI Methodology Disclosure

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and Return on Investment (ROI) figures presented on this page are derived from AXE Machinery d.o.o. internal financial models using ISO 15686-5:2017 life-cycle costing methodology. Assumptions include regional energy tariffs, labor rates, landfill tipping fees, and aggregate resale values current as of the test date. Actual results vary with feedstock composition, operator skill, ambient conditions, maintenance regime, and regional regulatory environment. Each quantitative claim is traceable to a methodology registry entry — click the ℹ badge next to any metric for full test conditions.

Fair-Use Trademark Notice

All third-party trademarks, service marks, and trade names referenced on this platform — including but not limited to Doppstadt®, Hammel®, Lindner®, Terex®, Sandvik®, Metso®, Morbark®, Komptech®, UNTHA®, TANA®, and Pronar® — are the property of their respective owners. References to these marks are made solely for technical comparison, identification, and commentary purposes under the fair-use doctrine. Such references do not imply endorsement, sponsorship, affiliation, or partnership. AXE Machinery d.o.o. respects all intellectual property rights and will promptly address any concerns raised by trademark holders.

Empirical Test Conditions & Methodology

All performance metrics (KTQ uptime, fuel burn, throughput, torque, clog-rate) are derived from controlled test conditions documented per AXE internal protocol registry. Each metric is cross-referenced to a methodology ID, applicable ISO/ASTM/DIN standard, test date, and verifier identity. Test conditions include specified feedstock (e.g. concrete B25-B45 with rebar ≤32 mm), ambient temperature, operator profile, and observation window. Actual field performance may differ; contact AXE Machinery d.o.o. for a region-specific TCO analysis tailored to your operational profile.

E-E-A-T Provenance

Per Google's E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) guidelines, every quantitative claim on this platform is traceable to a primary source. Click any ℹ badge next to a metric to view: methodology ID, ISO/ASTM standard reference, test protocol revision, controlled test conditions, ISO-8601 test date, verifier identity, and verification status (self-verified / third-party / pending).

Last updated: 2026-08-09

ROI Engine · Per Shift

Fiscal Shield Capital: 1,998.81 EUR

Landfill fee €25/t, fuel consumption 0.27 l/t, and wear factor 0.85 are locked into the shift model.

tensile fracture, cutting regime, TCO, OPEX — wear cassette, twin-shaft

Technical Analysis

THE 0.27 L/T FUEL FLOOR

The 0.27 litres-per-tonne figure published for the ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II is the lowest published diesel fuel consumption benchmark for a mobile slow-speed shredder processing standard construction and demolition waste. The figure is measured under the ARJES in-house test protocol (vol. 4, 2026) on a mixed C&D stream: 40% concrete, 25% brick, 20% asphalt, 10% wood, 5% metals and miscellaneous, at a throughput of 39 ST/h and a feed particle size of 0-16 in. The benchmark reflects the platform's two fuel-saving architectural choices: (1) the Volvo Penta TAD581VE Stage V engine's high-efficiency common-rail injection, which holds specific fuel consumption at 198 g/kWh across the 60–85% load band where the shredder operates; (2) the asynchronous dual-shaft kinematic that maintains cutting torque at low engine RPM, allowing the engine to operate at its BSFC (brake specific fuel consumption) sweet spot rather than high-RPM torque reserves. The 0.27 l/t figure is not a marketing peak — it is the sustained operating-point consumption under standard C&D load.

COMPETITOR FUEL LANDSCAPE

The 2026 competitor dataset places single-shaft and kinetic-drum mobile shredders at 2.9–3.9x the ARJES fuel benchmark. The Haas Tyron 1500 — a single-shaft diesel shredder with a 295 HP Cummins QSB6.7 Stage V — publishes 0.78 l/t on the same mixed C&D stream. The fuel premium reflects the single-shaft kinematic's higher reversibility frequency: every rebar-wrap or hard-object incident triggers a reverse-and-clear cycle that burns fuel without producing throughput. The Pronar MRW 2.85 — a dual-shaft diesel competitor architecturally closer to ARJES — publishes 0.92 l/t, the higher figure reflecting the smaller-diameter shafts (lower torque per shaft revolution) and the 333 HP engine operating further from its BSFC sweet spot under C&D load. The Komptech Terminator 6000 — a single-shaft 476 HP electric with a diesel auxiliary pack for sites without grid access — publishes 1.05 l/t when running on diesel auxiliary, reflecting both the single-shaft reversibility penalty and the auxiliary pack's lower efficiency compared to a direct-drive main engine. Across the four competitors, no diesel mobile shredder in the 2026 dataset beats 0.78 l/t.

ANNUALISED FUEL ECONOMICS — 58,500 EUR/YR DELTA

For a CEE demolition contractor processing 50,000 tonnes of C&D waste per year (the typical throughput for a single-shredder fleet on a 5-site annual profile), the fuel cost delta is decisive. At the Q32026 EU industrial diesel price of $6.13/gal (including excise, excluding VAT): ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II annual fuel cost = 50,000 t × 0.27 l/t × $6.13/gal = $21,870. Komptech Terminator 6000 annual fuel cost (diesel auxiliary) = 50,000 t × 1.05 l/t × $6.13/gal = $85,050. Annual fuel cost delta: $63,180. Across a 10-year asset life, the cumulative fuel cost delta reaches $631,800 — a figure that exceeds the ARJES Impaktor's CAPEX. The fuel line item alone — before considering hardfacing downtime, hooklift logistics, or maintenance — delivers a 4-year breakeven on the ARJES platform's CAPEX premium. For operators with grid access, the ARJES Impaktor 1250 E electric variant eliminates the fuel line entirely, replacing it with a $0.162/kWh electricity cost that delivers a further 35–45% reduction on the energy line item.

CO2 AND ESG IMPLICATIONS

Beyond the direct OPEX delta, the fuel benchmark carries significant CO2 and ESG reporting implications. Diesel combustion emits 6 lb CO2 per litre (well-to-wheel, IPCC AR6 factor). The ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II emits 50,000 t × 0.27 l/t × 6 lb/l = 36.2 tonnes CO2 per year. The Komptech Terminator 6000 emits 50,000 t × 1.05 l/t × 6 lb/l = 140.7 tonnes CO2 per year. The 104.5 t CO2/yr delta is material for ESG reporting under the EU CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive), which from FY 2026 requires large EU-based contractors to disclose Scope 1 emissions from mobile equipment. Operators running 3–5 shredders across multiple CEE jurisdictions will see annual Scope 1 emissions reduced by 300–500 tonnes CO2 by selecting the ARJES platform — a figure that, at the EU ETS allowance price of $92/t (Q32026), carries an additional 25,500–$45,900/yr of avoided carbon cost. The total annual OPEX + carbon delta on a 50,000 t/yr operator profile: 84,000–$109,080 in favour of the ARJES platform. The verdict is unambiguous: 0.27 l/t is the diesel fuel floor in 2026, and no competitor in the dataset approaches it.

INTERACTIVE DATA VISUALIZATION

LOADING CHART DATA...

Reference machine vs Competitor

ARJES Impaktor 1000 vs HAAS Tyron 1500 — Asynchronous vs Synchronized Twin-Shaft

HAAS Tyron 1500 — a German twin-shaft synchronized shredder (30 t, CAT C13 350 kW) targeted at C&D and MSW, weighed against the ARJES Impaktor 1000 (dual-shaft asynchronous hydrostatic, ~18 t, 160,000 Nm asynchronous torque baseline). The matchup exposes the synchronized-twin-shaft torque ceiling against the ARJES asynchronous kinematic, plus the 96-hour hardfacing penalty for the monolithic HAAS shaft versus the 2-hour ARJES cassette exchange.

ARJES Impaktor 1000 · HAAS Tyron 1500

Technical Specifications

Spec	ARJES Impaktor 1000	HAAS Tyron 1500
Drive concept	Dual-shaft asynchronous low-speed hydrostatic	Twin-shaft synchronized mechanical
Engine	Volvo Penta TAD 1642 VE (Stage V)	Caterpillar C13 ACERT (Stage V)
Drive power	354	350
Operating weight	~18	30
Asynchronous torque baseline	160,000 (asynchronous)	~140,000 (synchronized, fixed ratio)

Verdict

Advantage

Asynchronous hydrostatic delivers 14% more torque — significantly attenuated shock loads to drivetrain

The HAAS Tyron 1500 routes power through a fixed-ratio mechanical gearbox.
Torque is a function of gear ratio and engine RPM — no dynamic adaptation.
When a contaminant jams a shaft, the full shock pulse transmits through the gear-mesh into the engine block.
ARJES Impaktor 1000 decouples shafts via asynchronous hydrostatic motors: each shaft runs independently with 118,010 lb-ft of sustained cutting torque — 14% above the HAAS's 103,259 lb-ft.
Hydrostatic circuits absorb energy spikes; the opposite shaft continues uninterrupted.
Result: fewer stalls, faster cycle recovery, reduced gear-mesh fatigue exposure under ARJ-TRQ-2026 protocol.

Advantage

96h hardfacing/welding downtime vs 2h Quick-Change Cassette — 48× production loss

Every time the HAAS Tyron 1500 needs shaft maintenance, the machine goes down for 96 hours of hardfacing, welding, or in-frame shaft removal.
Hardfacing requires pre-heat, weld deposition, post-weld cool-down, and re-balancing — each cycle introduces HAZ cracking risk.
ARJES Impaktor 1000 completes a shaft swap in 2 hours via Quick-Change Cassette: the entire rotor assembly lifts out as a cartridge and a pre-balanced spare drops in.
No welding, no HAZ, no cool-down — 48× faster return to production.
Over 2000 annual hours with 4–6 shaft changes, this saves 470+ hours of downtime per year.

Advantage

66,139 lb breaches EU 40 t GVW — permits, escorts, low-boy every move

The HAAS Tyron 1500 at 66,139 lb exceeds the 24 t threshold for standard hook-lift/flatbed within EU 40 t GVW.
Every relocation requires low-boy, heavy-haul permit (3–14 day lead), and often pilot escort.
Per-move cost: $1,620–3000 on top of standard $864–1200.
ARJES Impaktor 1000 at 39,683 lb stays within standard transport class — hook-lift, zero permits, same-day relocation.
For 10–20 moves/year, this saves $16,200–60000 annually.

View full comparison

Reference machine vs Competitor

ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs Pronar MRW 2.85 — Single-Shaft vs Dual-Shaft Shredder

Pronar MRW 2.85 — a Polish single-shaft slow-speed shredder (19.5 t, Scania DC09 265 kW) engineered for C&D and biomass, weighed against the ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II (dual-shaft asynchronous hydrostatic, 14 t hooklift-compatible, 0.27 l/t fuel benchmark). The matchup exposes the 96-hour hardfacing downtime penalty of the monolithic Pronar shaft versus the 2-hour ARJES quick-change cassette system.

ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II · Pronar MRW 2.85

Technical Specifications

Spec	ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II	Pronar MRW 2.85
Drive concept	Dual-shaft asynchronous low-speed hydrostatic	Single-shaft low-speed mechanical
Engine	Volvo Penta TAD 551 VE (Stage V)	Scania DC09 (Stage V)
Drive power	129	265
Operating weight	14 (hooklift-compatible)	19.5 (oversize permit)
Asynchronous torque baseline	160,000	~85,000 (single-shaft mechanical)

Verdict

Advantage

Asynchronous hydrostatic delivers 88% more torque — significantly attenuated shock loads to drivetrain

The Pronar MRW 2.85 routes power through a fixed-ratio mechanical gearbox.
Torque is a function of gear ratio and engine RPM — no dynamic adaptation.
When a contaminant jams a shaft, the full shock pulse transmits through the gear-mesh into the engine block.
ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II decouples shafts via asynchronous hydrostatic motors: each shaft runs independently with 118,010 lb-ft of sustained cutting torque — 88% above the Pronar's 62,693 lb-ft.
Hydrostatic circuits absorb energy spikes; the opposite shaft continues uninterrupted.
Result: fewer stalls, faster cycle recovery, reduced gear-mesh fatigue exposure under ARJ-TRQ-2026 protocol.

Advantage

96h hardfacing/welding downtime vs 2h Quick-Change Cassette — 48× production loss

Every time the Pronar MRW 2.85 needs shaft maintenance, the machine goes down for 96 hours of hardfacing, welding, or in-frame shaft removal.
Hardfacing requires pre-heat, weld deposition, post-weld cool-down, and re-balancing — each cycle introduces HAZ cracking risk.
ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II completes a shaft swap in 2 hours via Quick-Change Cassette: the entire rotor assembly lifts out as a cartridge and a pre-balanced spare drops in.
No welding, no HAZ, no cool-down — 48× faster return to production.
Over 2000 annual hours with 4–6 shaft changes, this saves 470+ hours of downtime per year.

Advantage

ARJES at 30,865 lb — hook-lift agile, 12,125 lb lighter than Pronar

The Pronar MRW 2.85 at 42,990 lb sits in a borderline transport class.
ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II at 30,865 lb is 12,125 lb lighter and firmly within hook-lift / standard flatbed class.
Same-day relocation, zero permit overhead, $540–1500 lower per-move cost.
For 10–20 moves/year, transport delta compounds into $5,400–30000 annually.

View full comparison

System Integrity

nominal

Power Unit

Hydraulics

Shaft Sync

SCU Logic

Magnetic Sep.

Cooling

Telemetry

Track Drive

Impaktor Range

250 EVO I250 EVO II350 EVO I350 EVO II850100011001250 E1250 D

Impaktor Range · Performance Data

IMPAKTOR 250 EVO II — View specs→IMPAKTOR 1000 — View specs→

SOLUTIONS · Related Reports

Construction Demolition→Wood Recycling→Municipal Solid Waste→

// RELATED INDUSTRIAL ENTITIES6 nodes

RESEARCH

MODELS

Verification Reports · External Sources

ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II Fuel Consumption Spechttps://arjes-impaktor.com/Haas Tyron 1500 Fuel Consumption Datahttps://www.haas-recycling.com/Pronar MRW 2.85 Fuel Consumption Audithttps://pronar.pl/en/

0.27 l/t Fuel Benchmark: ARJES vs Haas, Pronar, Komptech

ARJES Impaktor 1000 vs HAAS Tyron 1500 — Asynchronous vs Synchronized Twin-Shaft

Spec

ARJES Impaktor 1000

HAAS Tyron 1500

Drive concept

Dual-shaft asynchronous low-speed hydrostatic

Twin-shaft synchronized mechanical

Engine

Volvo Penta TAD 1642 VE (Stage V)

Caterpillar C13 ACERT (Stage V)

Drive power

354

350

Operating weight

~18

Asynchronous torque baseline

160,000 (asynchronous)

~140,000 (synchronized, fixed ratio)

ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs Pronar MRW 2.85 — Single-Shaft vs Dual-Shaft Shredder

Spec

ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II

Pronar MRW 2.85

Drive concept

Dual-shaft asynchronous low-speed hydrostatic

Single-shaft low-speed mechanical

Engine

Volvo Penta TAD 551 VE (Stage V)

Scania DC09 (Stage V)

Drive power

129

265

Operating weight

14 (hooklift-compatible)

19.5 (oversize permit)

Asynchronous torque baseline

160,000

~85,000 (single-shaft mechanical)