Programmatic Comparison · Engineering Brief
ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II vs Doppstadt DW 3060 — 130,000 Nm torque, 2-hour cassette swap, and throughput on roots and biomass.
| Spec | ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II | Doppstadt DW 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive concept | Dual-shaft asynchronous low-speed hydrostatic | |
| Engine | Volvo Penta TAD 583 VE (Stage V) | |
| Drive power (kW) | 177 | |
| Drive power (HP) | 238 | |
| Operating weight (kg) | 21,000 | |
| Cutting torque (Nm) | 130,000 | |
| Shaft speed (rpm) | 11–35 (variable) | |
| Hydrostatic service interval (hrs) | 500 | |
| Shaft cassette swap time (hrs) | 2 (quick-change) | |
| Setup time (hrs) | 0.5 (SCU auto-calibration) |
| Material | ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II | Doppstadt DW 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Old wood / biomass | 12-28 ST/h | 10-24 ST/h |
| Green cuttings / root wood | 22-50 ST/h | 20-42 ST/h |
| Commercial waste | 11-24 ST/h | 9-20 ST/h |
| Reinforced concrete (with rebar) | On-demand shred | Not recommended |
Gate fees, landfill taxes, and electricity prices swing the verdict by ±30%. Run the live TCO model for your region to see real payback.
The ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II. Its 130 000 Nm of cutting torque is 24% higher than the Doppstadt DW 3060’s 105 000 Nm, which translates directly into fewer stall events and higher throughput on dense root wood feedstock.
ARJES quick-change cassette system completes a shaft swap in ~2 hours. The Doppstadt DW 3060 requires an in-frame shaft change of approximately 48 hours — a 24× difference that compounds across a year of mixed-feed operation.
No. Doppstadt does not recommend rebar concrete for the DW 3060 due to mechanical driveline vulnerability. The ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II handles reinforced concrete with rebar on demand.
Need a detailed TCO model for your facility and feedstock mix?
AXE Machinery d.o.o. is an independent authorized dealer of ARJES recycling machinery. AXE Machinery d.o.o. is NOT affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by, or in any way officially connected with Doppstadt GmbH, Hammel GmbH, Lindner-Recyclingtech GmbH, Terex Corporation, Sandvik AB, Metso Outotec, Morbark LLC, or any other manufacturer referenced in this comparative analysis. All third-party company names, product names, and trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are used solely for technical comparison and identification purposes under the fair-use doctrine.
All third-party trademarks, service marks, and trade names referenced on this platform — including but not limited to Doppstadt®, Hammel®, Lindner®, Terex®, Sandvik®, Metso®, Morbark®, Komptech®, UNTHA®, TANA®, and Pronar® — are the property of their respective owners. References to these marks are made solely for technical comparison, identification, and commentary purposes under the fair-use doctrine. Such references do not imply endorsement, sponsorship, affiliation, or partnership. AXE Machinery d.o.o. respects all intellectual property rights and will promptly address any concerns raised by trademark holders.
All performance metrics (KTQ uptime, fuel burn, throughput, torque, clog-rate) are derived from controlled test conditions documented per AXE internal protocol registry. Each metric is cross-referenced to a methodology ID, applicable ISO/ASTM/DIN standard, test date, and verifier identity. Test conditions include specified feedstock (e.g. concrete B25-B45 with rebar ≤32 mm), ambient temperature, operator profile, and observation window. Actual field performance may differ; contact AXE Machinery d.o.o. for a region-specific TCO analysis tailored to your operational profile.
Per Google's E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) guidelines, every quantitative claim on this platform is traceable to a primary source. Click any ℹ badge next to a metric to view: methodology ID, ISO/ASTM standard reference, test protocol revision, controlled test conditions, ISO-8601 test date, verifier identity, and verification status (self-verified / third-party / pending).
