AXE Machinery Logo
AXE Machinery Logo
MACHINERY//DISTRIBUTOR
ARJESIMPAKTOR
01Home
02MODELS

// COMPACT

[ 01 ]250 EVO I//[ 02 ]250 E EVO I//[ 03 ]250 EVO II//[ 04 ]250 E EVO II//

// STANDARD

[ 01 ]350 EVO I//[ 02 ]350 E EVO I//[ 03 ]350 EVO II//[ 04 ]350 E EVO II//

// HEAVY

[ 01 ]850//[ 02 ]1000//[ 03 ]1100//

// SUPER HEAVY

[ 01 ]1250 D//[ 02 ]1250 E//

// Machinery Archive

[ 00 ]All Models//[ 99 ]PDF Library//
Active
03SOLUTIONS
04TECH
05COMPLIANCE
Request
HomeTechCompareVermeer LS3600TX

Programmatic Comparison · Engineering Brief

ARJES Impaktor 850 vs Vermeer LS3600TX — Single-Shaft Shredder Comparison

ARJES Impaktor 850 vs Vermeer LS3600TX — 204,000 Nm asynchronous torque, 2-hour cassette swap, and 24t logistics vs 32.49t heavy-haul and mechanical driveline shock penalty.

Reference machine: ARJES Impaktor 850 · Competitor: Vermeer LS3600TX

Technical Specifications

SpecARJES Impaktor 850Vermeer LS3600TX
Drive conceptSingle-shaft asynchronous hydro-mechanical, independent reverseSingle-shaft direct mechanical twin-disk reversing, ball-detent torque limiter
EngineCAT C9 (Stage V / Tier 4 Final)CAT C13B (Tier 4 Final / Stage V)
Drive power (kW)340340
Drive power (HP)460456
Operating weight (kg)24,000 (lowbed transport)32,490 (heavy-haul permit)
Transport width (mm)2,4502,550+
Cutting torque (Nm)204,000 (asynchronous)2,822 (mechanical driveline, before gear reduction)
Max fuel consumption (l/h)35 – 4573.1 (peak load)
Specific fuel (l/t, C&D)0.35 – 0.420.50 – 0.65
Rotor / cutting systemSingle-shaft, quick-change cassette (7,716 lb)Single-shaft, 21/42-tip duplex bolt-on comb teeth
Shaft / tooth swap time (hrs)2 (quick-change cassette)0.5 – 1 (bolt-on tip replacement, no hardfacing)
Torque protection mechanismAsynchronous hydrostatic — absorbs shock hydraulically, no discrete tripBall-detent torque limiter — transmits brief shock before disengagement
Belly conveyor serviceabilityStandard service accessSingle sliding cartridge removal (no discharge conveyor detachment)
EU 40t GVW complianceBorderline (24 t + truck + trailer ≈ 37–40 t)Exceeds (32.49 t + truck + trailer > 40 t)
Hook-lift compatibilityNo (24 t exceeds hook-lift range)No (32.49 t exceeds hook-lift range)

Throughput by Material

MaterialARJES Impaktor 850Vermeer LS3600TX
Waste wood / old timber29-57 ST/h28-50 ST/h
Green cuttings / biomass50-99 ST/h44-88 ST/h
Commercial / industrial waste17-35 ST/h13-31 ST/h
C&D waste / mixed construction debris22-44 ST/h17-39 ST/h

Verdict

Advantage

150,463 lb-ft sustained torque vs kinetic drivetrain — no contest on contaminated feedstock

  • The Vermeer LS3600TX runs a high-speed kinetic cuttermill where torque drops as RPM rises.
  • No published sustained torque rating — the drivetrain is speed-dominant.
  • ARJES Impaktor 850 delivers 150,463 lb-ft of sustained low-speed cutting torque through asynchronous hydrostatic motors.
  • On contaminated C&D with embedded rebar, the torque reserve reduces stall frequency and recovery time.
Advantage

Maintenance cycle favors ARJES: 2h swap vs 1h Vermeer intervention

  • The Vermeer LS3600TX requires 1 hours per shaft/tool maintenance event.
  • ARJES Impaktor 850 completes Quick-Change Cassette swap in 2 hours — no welding, bearing pull, or alignment checks.
  • Combined with 500 h ARJES service interval vs 250 h for Vermeer, the scheduled maintenance burden is measurably lower.
Advantage

71,628 lb breaches EU 40 t GVW — permits, escorts, low-boy every move

  • The Vermeer LS3600TX at 71,628 lb exceeds the 24 t threshold for standard hook-lift/flatbed within EU 40 t GVW.
  • Every relocation requires low-boy, heavy-haul permit (3–14 day lead), and often pilot escort.
  • Per-move cost: $1,620–3000 on top of standard $864–1200.
  • ARJES Impaktor 850 at 52,911 lb stays within standard transport class — hook-lift, zero permits, same-day relocation.
  • For 10–20 moves/year, this saves $16,200–60000 annually.
MODEL TCO FOR YOUR JURISDICTION

Gate fees, landfill taxes, and electricity prices swing the verdict by ±30%. Run the live TCO model for your region to see real payback.

Compliance Hub // 13 jurisdictions · interactive calculator
Run Live TCO Model

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Vermeer LS3600TX directly comparable to the ARJES Impaktor 850?

Both are heavy single-shaft shredders in a similar weight class — the Vermeer LS3600TX at 32.49 t with a 340 kW CAT C13B, the ARJES Impaktor 850 at 24 t with a 340 kW CAT C9. They are commonly shortlisted together for C&D and green-waste processing where the choice hinges on driveline architecture (mechanical vs asynchronous hydro-mechanical), regulatory transport, and serviceability.

Which shredder has lower total cost of ownership over 10,000 hours?

For multi-site CEE deployments, the ARJES Impaktor 850 delivers lower TCO through 35–45 l/h fuel consumption (vs 73.1 l/h peak for Vermeer), 2-hour cassette swaps, and borderline GVW compliance. The Vermeer LS3600TX offsets with faster localized tip replacement (0.5–1 h) and superior belly conveyor serviceability, but its heavy-haul transport costs (€3,000–8,000/move), higher fuel burn, and shock-load bearing fatigue offset these advantages over a 10,000-hour horizon.

How does the Vermeer ball-detent torque limiter compare to ARJES asynchronous drive protection?

The Vermeer ball-detent torque limiter is a mechanical clutch that disengages the driveline when torque exceeds its set point (2,822 Nm), protecting the gearbox from catastrophic failure. However, before disengagement, the full kinetic shock load is transmitted to the rotor, bearings, and tooth tips. The ARJES asynchronous hydro-mechanical drive absorbs shock loads hydraulically throughout the overload event — there is no discrete trip point, so the system compresses the peak impulse rather than passing it. For contaminated C&D with embedded rebar, the ARJES approach yields significantly lower cumulative bearing fatigue.

Request a Quote for ARJES Impaktor 850

Need a detailed TCO model for your facility and feedstock mix?

Other Comparisons

  • ARJES Impaktor 850 vs Terex TTS 620
  • ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II vs Lindner Utrimat 7000
  • ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II vs Doppstadt DW 3060
  • ARJES Impaktor 1000 vs Hammel VB 950 DK
  • ARJES Impaktor 1100 vs Atlas Copco ST 1000
  • ARJES Impaktor 1250 D vs Metso LT120
  • ARJES Impaktor 1250 E vs Lindner Komet 2800
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs EDGE Slayer VS420
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs Metso M&J PreShred 4000M
  • ARJES Impaktor 1250 E vs TANA Shark 4400
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs Pronar MRW 2.85
  • ARJES Impaktor 1000 vs HAAS Tyron 1500
  • ARJES Impaktor 1250 E vs Komptech Terminator 6000
  • ARJES Impaktor 1250 E vs UNTHA XR mobil-e
  • ARJES Impaktor 1000 vs Bandit 3680XP Track
  • ARJES Impaktor 850 vs Bandit 2680XP Track
  • ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II vs Terex Ecotec TDS 820
  • ARJES Impaktor 850 vs Terex Ecotec TDS V20
  • ARJES Impaktor 850 vs Doppstadt Inventhor 9
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs Hammel VB 750
Compliance · E-E-A-T · Fair Use

Legal Notice & Methodology Disclosure

Independent Comparative Analysis — Non-Affiliation Disclosure

AXE Machinery d.o.o. is an independent authorized dealer of ARJES recycling machinery. AXE Machinery d.o.o. is NOT affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by, or in any way officially connected with Doppstadt GmbH, Hammel GmbH, Lindner-Recyclingtech GmbH, Terex Corporation, Sandvik AB, Metso Outotec, Morbark LLC, or any other manufacturer referenced in this comparative analysis. All third-party company names, product names, and trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are used solely for technical comparison and identification purposes under the fair-use doctrine.

Fair-Use Trademark Notice

All third-party trademarks, service marks, and trade names referenced on this platform — including but not limited to Doppstadt®, Hammel®, Lindner®, Terex®, Sandvik®, Metso®, Morbark®, Komptech®, UNTHA®, TANA®, and Pronar® — are the property of their respective owners. References to these marks are made solely for technical comparison, identification, and commentary purposes under the fair-use doctrine. Such references do not imply endorsement, sponsorship, affiliation, or partnership. AXE Machinery d.o.o. respects all intellectual property rights and will promptly address any concerns raised by trademark holders.

Empirical Test Conditions & Methodology

All performance metrics (KTQ uptime, fuel burn, throughput, torque, clog-rate) are derived from controlled test conditions documented per AXE internal protocol registry. Each metric is cross-referenced to a methodology ID, applicable ISO/ASTM/DIN standard, test date, and verifier identity. Test conditions include specified feedstock (e.g. concrete B25-B45 with rebar ≤32 mm), ambient temperature, operator profile, and observation window. Actual field performance may differ; contact AXE Machinery d.o.o. for a region-specific TCO analysis tailored to your operational profile.

E-E-A-T Provenance

Per Google's E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) guidelines, every quantitative claim on this platform is traceable to a primary source. Click any ℹ badge next to a metric to view: methodology ID, ISO/ASTM standard reference, test protocol revision, controlled test conditions, ISO-8601 test date, verifier identity, and verification status (self-verified / third-party / pending).

Last updated: 2026-08-09

// INFORMATION HUB

Research & EngineeringCompliance HubNEWSLogistics & Legacy

Industrial Solutions by Material // Operational Hubs

Concrete CrushingWood RecyclingScrap Metal ProcessingMunicipal Solid WasteConstruction DemolitionOTR Tire RecyclingELV RecyclingAll Solutions →

// COMPARISON MATRIX

IN-HOUSE vs SUBCONTRACTINGMOBILE vs STATIONARYDIESEL vs ELECTRICTEREX TTS 620 vs IMPAKTORTANA SHARK 4400 vs IMPAKTOR 1250 ELINDNER UPTREK 7000All Comparisons →

// CONNECT & CONTACT

+381644422555
info@arjes-impaktor.rs
BC Usce, Tower 1Bulevar Mihajla Pupina 611070 Belgrade, SerbiaUTC+144.8125 N, 20.4612 E
AXE Machinery Logo
ARJESIMPAKTOR
LegalPrivacy PolicyTerms of Use
© 2026 AXE Machinery. All Rights Reserved