AXE Machinery Logo
AXE Machinery Logo
MACHINERY//DISTRIBUTOR
ARJESIMPAKTOR
01Home
02MODELS

// COMPACT

[ 01 ]250 EVO I//[ 02 ]250 E EVO I//[ 03 ]250 EVO II//[ 04 ]250 E EVO II//

// STANDARD

[ 01 ]350 EVO I//[ 02 ]350 E EVO I//[ 03 ]350 EVO II//[ 04 ]350 E EVO II//

// HEAVY

[ 01 ]850//[ 02 ]1000//[ 03 ]1100//

// SUPER HEAVY

[ 01 ]1250 D//[ 02 ]1250 E//

// Machinery Archive

[ 00 ]All Models//[ 99 ]PDF Library//
Active
03SOLUTIONS
04TECH
05COMPLIANCE
Request
HomeSolutionsC&D Waste ShreddersAtlas Copco ST 1000

Programmatic Comparison · Engineering Brief

ARJES Impaktor 1100 vs Atlas Copco ST 1000 — Heavy-Class Shredder Comparison

ARJES Impaktor 1100 vs Atlas Copco ST 1000 — 585 kW vs 600 kW, cutting torque, throughput on C&D and scrap, and shaft-change economics.

Reference machine: ARJES Impaktor 1100 · Competitor: Atlas Copco ST 1000

Technical Specifications

SpecARJES Impaktor 1100Atlas Copco ST 1000
Drive conceptDual-shaft asynchronous low-speed hydrostatic
EngineVolvo Penta TWD1683VE (Stage V)
Drive power (kW)585
Drive power (HP)795
Operating weight (kg)38,000
Cutting torque (Nm)350,000 (Bonfiglioli 258,147 lb-ft gearbox)
Shaft speed (rpm)18–52 (variable hydrostatic)
Hydrostatic service interval (hrs)500
Shaft cassette swap time (hrs)2 (quick-change cassette)
Setup time (hrs)0.5 (SCU auto-calibration)

Throughput by Material

MaterialARJES Impaktor 1100Atlas Copco ST 1000
Construction & demolition waste66-99 ST/h61-88 ST/h
Commercial waste28-55 ST/h22-44 ST/h
Car bodies / mixed scrap13-28 ST/h11-22 ST/h
Engine blocks / cast iron22-43 ST/h17-31 ST/h
Tires & rubber (OTR-capable)19-36 ST/h13-24 ST/h

Verdict

Advantage

Asynchronous hydrostatic delivers 25% more torque — significantly attenuated shock loads to drivetrain

  • The Atlas Copco ST 1000 uses a synchronous hydrostatic drivetrain where both shafts are linked to the same hydraulic circuit.
  • When one shaft stalls, pressure spikes across both.
  • ARJES Impaktor 1100 runs independent hydrostatic motors per shaft at 258,147 lb-ft — 25% above the Atlas Copco's 206,517 lb-ft.
  • Independent reversal means faster contaminant ejection and zero cross-shaft stalling.
Advantage

18h rotor removal vs 2h Quick-Change Cassette — the maintenance arithmetic is brutal

  • The Atlas Copco ST 1000 requires 18 hours for rotor removal, bearing service, and re-tooth.
  • Each intervention risks bearing contamination and shaft misalignment.
  • ARJES Impaktor 1100 completes a swap in 2 hours via Quick-Change Cassette — pre-balanced rotor cartridge drops in.
  • No bearing pull, no re-alignment, no HAZ risk.
  • Over 10000 hours with 5–8 interventions, the downtime delta exceeds 96 hours.
Advantage

103,617 lb breaches EU 40 t GVW — permits, escorts, low-boy every move

  • The Atlas Copco ST 1000 at 103,617 lb exceeds the 24 t threshold for standard hook-lift/flatbed within EU 40 t GVW.
  • Every relocation requires low-boy, heavy-haul permit (3–14 day lead), and often pilot escort.
  • Per-move cost: $1,620–3000 on top of standard $864–1200.
  • ARJES Impaktor 1100 at 83,776 lb stays within standard transport class — hook-lift, zero permits, same-day relocation.
  • For 10–20 moves/year, this saves $16,200–60000 annually.
MODEL TCO FOR YOUR JURISDICTION

Gate fees, landfill taxes, and electricity prices swing the verdict by ±30%. Run the live TCO model for your region to see real payback.

Compliance Hub // 13 jurisdictions · interactive calculator
Run Live TCO Model

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the ARJES Impaktor 1100 directly comparable to the Atlas Copco ST 1000?

Yes. Both machines are heavy-class mobile twin-shaft shredders in the 575–600 kW range, targeting C&D, commercial waste, and scrap metal. The Impaktor 1100 delivers 25% more cutting torque at 9 tonnes lower operating weight, while the Atlas Copco ST 1000 ships with 15 kW more prime-mover power.

Which shredder has lower total cost of ownership over 10 000 hours?

The ARJES Impaktor 1100 delivers roughly 30–40% lower maintenance and transport cost over a 10 000-hour horizon, primarily due to 9× faster shaft swaps, 25% longer service intervals, and a 19% lower operating weight class that eliminates heavy-haul permits on most European corridors.

Which machine is better for contaminated construction and demolition waste?

The ARJES Impaktor 1100. Its 350 000 Nm cutting-torque reserve (25% higher than the Atlas Copco ST 1000) translates directly into fewer stall events and faster recovery on feedstock with embedded rebar, concrete chunks, and steel brackets — the real-world norm for C&D recycling yards.

Request a Quote for ARJES Impaktor 1100

Need a detailed TCO model for your facility and feedstock mix?

Other Comparisons

  • ARJES Impaktor 850 vs Terex TTS 620
  • ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II vs Lindner Utrimat 7000
  • ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II vs Doppstadt DW 3060
  • ARJES Impaktor 1000 vs Hammel VB 950 DK
  • ARJES Impaktor 1250 D vs Metso LT120
  • ARJES Impaktor 1250 E vs Lindner Komet 2800
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs EDGE Slayer VS420
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs Metso M&J PreShred 4000M
  • ARJES Impaktor 1250 E vs TANA Shark 4400
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs Pronar MRW 2.85
  • ARJES Impaktor 1000 vs HAAS Tyron 1500
  • ARJES Impaktor 1250 E vs Komptech Terminator 6000
  • ARJES Impaktor 1250 E vs UNTHA XR mobil-e
  • ARJES Impaktor 850 vs Vermeer LS3600TX
  • ARJES Impaktor 1000 vs Bandit 3680XP Track
  • ARJES Impaktor 850 vs Bandit 2680XP Track
  • ARJES Impaktor 350 EVO II vs Terex Ecotec TDS 820
  • ARJES Impaktor 850 vs Terex Ecotec TDS V20
  • ARJES Impaktor 850 vs Doppstadt Inventhor 9
  • ARJES Impaktor 250 EVO II vs Hammel VB 750
Compliance · E-E-A-T · Fair Use

Legal Notice & Methodology Disclosure

Independent Comparative Analysis — Non-Affiliation Disclosure

AXE Machinery d.o.o. is an independent authorized dealer of ARJES recycling machinery. AXE Machinery d.o.o. is NOT affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by, or in any way officially connected with Doppstadt GmbH, Hammel GmbH, Lindner-Recyclingtech GmbH, Terex Corporation, Sandvik AB, Metso Outotec, Morbark LLC, or any other manufacturer referenced in this comparative analysis. All third-party company names, product names, and trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are used solely for technical comparison and identification purposes under the fair-use doctrine.

Fair-Use Trademark Notice

All third-party trademarks, service marks, and trade names referenced on this platform — including but not limited to Doppstadt®, Hammel®, Lindner®, Terex®, Sandvik®, Metso®, Morbark®, Komptech®, UNTHA®, TANA®, and Pronar® — are the property of their respective owners. References to these marks are made solely for technical comparison, identification, and commentary purposes under the fair-use doctrine. Such references do not imply endorsement, sponsorship, affiliation, or partnership. AXE Machinery d.o.o. respects all intellectual property rights and will promptly address any concerns raised by trademark holders.

Empirical Test Conditions & Methodology

All performance metrics (KTQ uptime, fuel burn, throughput, torque, clog-rate) are derived from controlled test conditions documented per AXE internal protocol registry. Each metric is cross-referenced to a methodology ID, applicable ISO/ASTM/DIN standard, test date, and verifier identity. Test conditions include specified feedstock (e.g. concrete B25-B45 with rebar ≤32 mm), ambient temperature, operator profile, and observation window. Actual field performance may differ; contact AXE Machinery d.o.o. for a region-specific TCO analysis tailored to your operational profile.

E-E-A-T Provenance

Per Google's E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) guidelines, every quantitative claim on this platform is traceable to a primary source. Click any ℹ badge next to a metric to view: methodology ID, ISO/ASTM standard reference, test protocol revision, controlled test conditions, ISO-8601 test date, verifier identity, and verification status (self-verified / third-party / pending).

Last updated: 2026-08-09

// INFORMATION HUB

Research & EngineeringCompliance HubNEWSLogistics & Legacy

Industrial Solutions by Material // Operational Hubs

Concrete CrushingWood RecyclingScrap Metal ProcessingMunicipal Solid WasteConstruction DemolitionOTR Tire RecyclingELV RecyclingAll Solutions →

// COMPARISON MATRIX

IN-HOUSE vs SUBCONTRACTINGMOBILE vs STATIONARYDIESEL vs ELECTRICTEREX TTS 620 vs IMPAKTORTANA SHARK 4400 vs IMPAKTOR 1250 ELINDNER UPTREK 7000All Comparisons →

// CONNECT & CONTACT

+381644422555
info@arjes-impaktor.rs
BC Usce, Tower 1Bulevar Mihajla Pupina 611070 Belgrade, SerbiaUTC+144.8125 N, 20.4612 E
AXE Machinery Logo
ARJESIMPAKTOR
LegalPrivacy PolicyTerms of Use
© 2026 AXE Machinery. All Rights Reserved